undertake a "politically incorrect" representation that he could not undertake at his prior firm.
Since 2003, his firm has focused on counseling industry, organizations, and individuals before state, federal, and local administrative agencies, trial courts, and appellate courts. Although has consults and litigates in private disputes, most of his caseload involves a governmental plaintiff or defendant and public-policy implications.
law in California and the District of Columbia, as well most federal Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court. In addition, many other states allow out-of-state attorneys to practice in their jurisdictions, under certain conditions.
The firm's independent structure enables its working with clients and prospective clients to develop flexible billing arrangements, including fixed-fee representations, monitoring for a capped monthly fee, and straight hourly billing.
District of Columbia, 1999
California, 1991
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S Courts of Appeal for the D.C., 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, 9th, 10th, and 11th Circuits, with e-filing privileges in 7th and 8th Circuits for amicus briefs
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Central, Eastern, Northern & Southern Districts of California, Western District of Michigan, and Western District of Pennsylvania
J.D., Harvard Law School, 1991
B.A., Franklin & Marshall College, 1984